case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It can be very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents from the boy or Woman tend not to approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they might Lower off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who is a major, the few is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by legislation.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres to the doctrine of stare decisis
PLR is really a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons possessing their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to the Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
Only the written opinions in the Supreme Court as well as Court of Appeals are routinely offered. Decisions with the reduced (trial) courts aren't generally published or distributed.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 with the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the grievance petition might be dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice can be a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation requires that a grievance notice be served to the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case law in the particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its very own set of binding case law. Due to this fact, a judgment rendered from the Ninth Circuit will not be binding during the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, website Karachi It's very well proven now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service composition but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it's lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if pleased that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service towards the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that these types of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a effectively-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.